Protestatism – Fordham Now https://now.fordham.edu The official news site for Fordham University. Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:40:52 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://now.fordham.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/favicon.png Protestatism – Fordham Now https://now.fordham.edu 32 32 232360065 New Book Explores Complex Archbishop Thomas Cranmer https://now.fordham.edu/inside-fordham/new-book-explores-complex-archbishop-thomas-cranmer/ Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:40:52 +0000 https://news.fordham.sitecare.pro/?p=75244 Thomas Cranmer, the Archbishop of Canterbury from 1533 to 1556, is well known for his role in helping build the case for the annulment of King Henry VIII’s marriage to Katherine of Aragon, which was one of the causes of the separation of the Church of England from union with the Holy See.

Photo by Chris Taggart

But in Thomas Cranmer (Routledge 2017), a new biography by Susan Wabuda, Ph.D., associate professor of history, fresh new details about Cranmer’s private life reveal a man who was more complicated than his public persona might have presented.

“His whole motivation was about saving souls. Many people know about the emergence of Martin Luther; Cranmer was part of that. He, too, was disturbed by the things that Luther was saying,” Wabuda said.

“So rather than come into any immediate conclusions, he sat down with all the books, read all the material that Luther had read, went back to the early fathers of the church, and made up his own mind.”

In the course of researching the book, Wabuda discovered definitive proof of Cranmer’s ordination, in 1515. This is important, she said, because it calls into question many of the early stories that were told about him. One story posited that he left a fellowship at Jesus College at Cambridge in order to get married, and when his wife died in childbirth, he came back.

“But that isn’t what happened. He seemed to have gotten married as an undergraduate, and we don’t know why. Whether he’d made a mistake, we just don’t know. But it seems clear he never intended to have a career in the church,” she said.

Wabuda called him a man of many contradictions, some of which she ultimately was not able to reconcile. He was known to be an inquisitive, curious, and driven man who cared about saving the souls of the faithful, and he supported William Tyndale’s efforts to translate the Bible into English and make it available for ordinary people to read.

He also brought to his position the talents of his tight-knit family, including a brother and sister, with whom he worked very closely with on matters such as the Eucharist, clerical celibacy, the role of images in places of worship, and the veneration of saints.

“They worked very hard to establish a Protestant Church in England. They did this together. It was not just one man fighting on his own; he had the backing of a loving family behind him,” she said.

 However, many of his efforts to reform the Church of England were thwarted, Wabuda said. Cranmer was never able to persuade Henry to align England with the Lutherans, and he could not persuade the king to allow the English people to worship in English. Not until the reign of Henry’s son, Edward VI (1547-1553), could Cranmer for the first time release all of the services of worship in English in the Book of Common Prayer. But King Edward died unexpectedly in July 1553. Cranmer’s life work was in danger of being discarded forever when he was executed by Queen Mary I.

“Cranmer is a really interesting figure to try to understand because the kinds of questions he wrestled with, and the problems he faced, are questions all of us are facing all the time. He came to his own solutions, and it’s absolutely reassuring to know that other people in the past had challenges that they rose to address,” Wabuda said.

In the end, his biggest challenge turned out to be his last—he was accused of heresy by Queen Mary I, the daughter of Katherine of Aragon. He was forced to retract everything he had ever taught to save his life, or stand up for what he believed in and face execution. After briefly backpedaling, he was burned at the stake in 1556.

“When he realized that no matter how many apologies he made they were going to kill him anyway, he refused any longer to deny what he had taught the English people as archbishop. He said that he had done wrong by signing retractions and apologies merely to save his own life. Rather, he decided to defend what he had taught, and to prove it, he put his right hand in the flames first, and held it there until he died,” Wabuda said.

His action, she said, helped many people believe what he taught was of value. When Elizabeth I became queen following Mary’s death in 1558, the Book of Common Prayer once again became the service book for the English Church.

“There were many people who thought he was a martyr. I conclude my book by saying ‘Well, he was, but he was a reluctant one.’”

]]>
75244
Faculty Reads: Jonathan Edwards’ Passionate Pursuit of Rational Truth https://now.fordham.edu/arts-and-culture/faculty-reads-jonathan-edwards-passionate-pursuit-of-rational-truth/ Thu, 03 Jul 2014 17:12:26 +0000 http://news.fordham.sitecare.pro/?p=39878 Think “Jonathan Edwards,” and images such as a zealous preacher at a pulpit or a spider dangling over a fire might come to mind.
But as Kathryn Reklis, Ph.D. reveals in her new book,Theology and the Kinesthetic Imagination: Jonathan Edwards and the Making of Modernity (Oxford University Press, 2014), the Jonathan Edwards of the Great Awakening was about much more than fire-and-brimstone.
Reklis, an assistant professor of theology, contends that Edwards is key to a problem plaguing many contemporary theologians: How theology can save itself from irrelevance in the postmodern world.
She explains that by the mid-20th century, many Christian theologians were growing dissatisfied with the way theology had been conducted over the previous two centuries.  The Enlightenment, the “Age of Reason,” prompted theologians to approach their discipline in a rationalistic way, treating Christian doctrines like logical propositions in an attempt to cast theology as a science.
However, this “rational pursuit of ultimate truth” left some concerned that theology had abandoned its true strengths, such as an emphasis on the roles that beauty, bodily experience, desire, and emotions play in Christian life.
Reklis argues that 18th-century American preacher Jonathan Edwards strikes that balance between those domains. A follower of John Locke and Isaac Newton, Edwards strived to pursue truth through a rational, scientific method. And yet, Edwards was also devoted to a more visceral pursuit of truth. He defended the intense religious revivals (passionate preaching experiences that often inspired intense emotional reactions in listeners) of the Great Awakening, and believed people could know God through a “‘spiritual sense’ as true and reliable as one of our five senses.”
“He was committed to ‘the new science’ of his day—meaning, truth arrived at through experience and deduction, or what we might think of as the scientific method,” Reklis said. “At the same time, he was a strict Calvinist […] To defend his understanding of Christianity, he turned to concepts of human desire, emotion, and bodily experience as proof of first-hand experience of the divine.
“So he was this strange figure who was embracing modernity—science, rationality, etc.—and who was also using those new tools to defend a very ‘old-fashioned’ view of Christianity.”
Herself a blend of historical and contemporary theological training, Reklis aims to use Edwards’ “alternative modern” approach to explore the question of contemporary theology’s relevance and how concepts such as beauty, body, and desire might serve to revive contemporary Christian theology.
“In [Edwards’] day, evangelical Christians split from ‘rational’ Christians, or what we came to call the mainline Protestant denominations in the United States,” she said. “I try to show that the same concepts many mainline academic Protestant theologians want to rescue now—such as the importance of beauty, bodily experience, and desire—are the ones Edwards used.”
— Joanna Klimaski Mercuri
]]>
39878